On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 04:16:07PM +0100, Andreas Grünbacher wrote: > > Without such a switch, way too large lins are parsed without errors, > > exceeding limits in various parts of the source. > > Shouldn't we instead fix the code where it is currently broken?
I just see than plan b can support an off_t amount of lines... I have to reevaluate this, probably my concern is void. Tobias
