On 14 Apr 2016 13:17, Chet Ramey wrote: > On 4/14/16 1:00 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On 14 Apr 2016 17:41, Yury Gribov wrote: > >> xmalloc > > > > you can ignore this. it's a long standing issue. any packages using > > xmalloc will be providing their own. if they get it from readline, > > it's an accident. > > Readline uses xmalloc/xrealloc/xfree and so provides its own copies in > case the application does not.
i'm aware, and i know of the previous threads on the topic. i don't think apps are expecting xmalloc/etc... to be provided by readline. -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-readline mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-readline
