On 4/20/16 3:55 AM, Yury Gribov wrote:
>> The alternative is bless the private symbols as
>> public API forever... Each package owner will know what their
>> package needs from readline and why they found a need
>> to (ab)use readline private symbols. I see no way around that.
>
> Guess that's what's going to happen (unless some motivated readline
> maintainer steps in, willing to work with various users on getting rid of
> leaked symbols).
I can work with people as my time permits, as long as they contact me.
I'm going to look at the visibility patches for the next bash/readline
release, but it's too late to get them into bash-4.4/readline-7.0.
Chet
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU [email protected] http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
_______________________________________________
Bug-readline mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-readline
