() Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> () Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:39:02 +0100
I suppose that it should be: "... not the future tense." You're right. Here's a patch:
doc/standards.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/standards.texi b/doc/standards.texi
index b2c1ae9..2d5f455 100644
*** a/doc/standards.texi
--- b/doc/standards.texi
***************
*** 3399,3405 ****
call with no arguments.
Whenever possible, please stick to the active voice, avoiding the
! passive, and use the present tense, not the future teste. For
instance, write ``The function @code{foo} returns a list containing
@var{a} and @var{b}'' rather than ``A list containing @var{a} and
@var{b} will be returned.'' One advantage of the active voice is it
--- 3399,3405 ----
call with no arguments.
Whenever possible, please stick to the active voice, avoiding the
! passive, and use the present tense, not the future tense. For
instance, write ``The function @code{foo} returns a list containing
@var{a} and @var{b}'' rather than ``A list containing @var{a} and
@var{b} will be returned.'' One advantage of the active voice is it
Maybe if you post a patch next time, it will be noticed sooner.
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen -----------------------------------------------
(defun responsep (query)
(pcase (context query)
(`(technical ,ml) (correctp ml))
...)) 748E A0E8 1CB8 A748 9BFA
--------------------------------------- 6CE4 6703 2224 4C80 7502
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
