bug-standards  

Messages by Thread

• Re: compressed release distribution formats (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Antonio Diaz Diaz
• purpose and implementation of code reviews Bruno Haible
  • Re: purpose and implementation of code reviews Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: purpose and implementation of code reviews Richard Stallman
  • Re: purpose and implementation of code reviews Patrice Dumas
  • Re: purpose and implementation of code reviews Richard Stallman
• GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Karl Berry
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Richard Stallman
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Zack Weinberg
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GCC reporting piped input as a security feature (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor dherring
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jose E. Marchesi
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jose E. Marchesi
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jose E. Marchesi
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Tomas Volf
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: libsystemd dependencies Bruno Haible
  • Re: libsystemd dependencies Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: libsystemd dependencies Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: reproducible dists and builds (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Russ Allbery
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Peter Johansson
  • Should the GNU Coding Standards make a recommendation about aclocal's `--install` flag? (was: "Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor") Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: automated release building service Bruno Haible
  • Re: automated release building service Tomas Volf
  • Re: automated release building service Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: automated release building service Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: binary data in source trees (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Alexandre Oliva
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Zack Weinberg
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Russ Allbery
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Zack Weinberg
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Russ Allbery
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Gallager
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: checking aclocal m4 files (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Sam James
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: detecting modified m4 files (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Eric Blake
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Bob Friesenhahn
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Karl Berry
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: compressed release distribution formats (was: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor) Jacob Bachmeyer
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor Richard Stallman
  • Re: Re: GNU Coding Standards, automake, and the recent xz-utils backdoor wrotycz
• Use a comma instead of semicolon in license notices Collin Funk
• make-stds.texi manual feedback David Apps
  • Re: make-stds.texi manual feedback Alfred M. Szmidt
  • make-stds.texi manual feedback David Apps
  • Re: make-stds.texi manual feedback Richard Stallman
  • make-stds.texi manual feedback David Apps
  • Re: make-stds.texi manual feedback Richard Stallman
  • Re: make-stds.texi manual feedback Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: make-stds.texi manual feedback Richard Stallman
• TAGS Makefile target Sandro Santilli
  • Re: TAGS Makefile target Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: TAGS Makefile target Sandro Santilli
• Position of conditionals in ChangeLog Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog Bruno Haible
  • Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog Bruno Haible
  • Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog Bruno Haible
  • Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog Bruno Haible
  • Re: Position of conditionals in ChangeLog Alfred M. Szmidt
• Possible error re Savannah in "Information for Maintainers of GNU Software" Tristan Miller
  • Re: Possible error re Savannah in "Information for Maintainers of GNU Software" Alfred M. Szmidt
• help gather backlogged issues Alfred M. Szmidt
• Re: Patch for Copyright Notices in maintain.texi [WAS: Re: Approving Dezyne, savannah task 16067] Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Patch for Copyright Notices in maintain.texi [WAS: Re: Approving Dezyne, savannah task 16067] Ineiev
  • Re: Patch for Copyright Notices in maintain.texi [WAS: Re: Approving Dezyne, savannah task 16067] Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Patch for Copyright Notices in maintain.texi [WAS: Re: Approving Dezyne, savannah task 16067] Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
  • Re: Patch for Copyright Notices in maintain.texi [WAS: Re: Approving Dezyne, savannah task 16067] Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Patch for Copyright Notices in maintain.texi [WAS: Re: Approving Dezyne, savannah task 16067] Richard Stallman
  • Re: Patch for Copyright Notices in maintain.texi [WAS: Re: Approving Dezyne, savannah task 16067] Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Patch for Copyright Notices in maintain.texi [WAS: Re: Approving Dezyne, savannah task 16067] Richard Stallman
  • Re: Patch for Copyright Notices in maintain.texi [WAS: Re: Approving Dezyne, savannah task 16067] Janneke Nieuwenhuizen
• proposed spelling fixes for maintain.texi, standards.texi Paul Eggert
  • Re: proposed spelling fixes for maintain.texi, standards.texi Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: proposed spelling fixes for maintain.texi, standards.texi Jose E. Marchesi
  • Re: proposed spelling fixes for maintain.texi, standards.texi Paul Eggert
• GPL is more than copying conditions Mohammad Akhlaghi
  • Re: GPL is more than copying conditions Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GPL is more than copying conditions Bruno Haible
  • Re: GPL is more than copying conditions Mohammad Akhlaghi
  • Re: GPL is more than copying conditions Per Bothner
  • Re: GPL is more than copying conditions Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GPL is more than copying conditions Per Bothner
  • Re: GPL is more than copying conditions Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: GPL is more than copying conditions Bruno Haible
  • Re: GPL is more than copying conditions John Darrington
• GTK+ has been renamed to GTK without the plus Vivien Kraus
  • Re: GTK+ has been renamed to GTK without the plus Alfred M. Szmidt
• Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Paul Eggert
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Valentin Lefebvre
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Bruno Haible
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Jason Sikes
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Bruno Haible
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Bruno Haible
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Jason Sikes
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Patrice Dumas
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Jason Sikes
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Jason Sikes
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Jason Sikes
  • Re: Add vendor configuration directory installation Alfred M. Szmidt
• GNU standards: DESTDIR with symlinks Adrian Mariano
  • Re: GNU standards: DESTDIR with symlinks Paul Smith
  • Re: GNU standards: DESTDIR with symlinks Adrian Mariano
  • Re: GNU standards: DESTDIR with symlinks Paul Smith
  • Re: GNU standards: DESTDIR with symlinks Adrian Mariano
  • Re: GNU standards: DESTDIR with symlinks Bruno Haible
  • Re: GNU standards: DESTDIR with symlinks Alfred M. Szmidt
• Missing [/usr/local]/var/lib and [/usr/local]/tmp Alejandro Colomar
  • Re: Missing [/usr/local]/var/lib and [/usr/local]/tmp Bruno Haible
  • Re: Missing [/usr/local]/var/lib and [/usr/local]/tmp Alejandro Colomar
  • Re: Missing [/usr/local]/var/lib and [/usr/local]/tmp Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Missing [/usr/local]/var/lib and [/usr/local]/tmp Alejandro Colomar
  • Re: Missing [/usr/local]/var/lib and [/usr/local]/tmp Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: Missing [/usr/local]/var/lib and [/usr/local]/tmp Alejandro Colomar
  • Re: Missing [/usr/local]/var/lib and [/usr/local]/tmp Edward Welbourne
  • Re: Missing [/usr/local]/var/lib and [/usr/local]/tmp Alejandro Colomar
  • Re: Missing [/usr/local]/var/lib and [/usr/local]/tmp Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Missing [/usr/local]/var/lib and [/usr/local]/tmp Bruno Haible
  • Re: Missing [/usr/local]/var/lib and [/usr/local]/tmp Jeffrey Walton
• [BUG] inconsistency in $localstatedir and $runstatedir Alejandro Colomar
  • Re: [BUG] inconsistency in $localstatedir and $runstatedir Paul Smith
  • Re: [BUG] inconsistency in $localstatedir and $runstatedir Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
  • Re: [BUG] inconsistency in $localstatedir and $runstatedir Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: [BUG] inconsistency in $localstatedir and $runstatedir Alejandro Colomar
  • Re: [BUG] inconsistency in $localstatedir and $runstatedir Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: [BUG] inconsistency in $localstatedir and $runstatedir Alejandro Colomar
  • Re: [BUG] inconsistency in $localstatedir and $runstatedir Edward Welbourne
  • Re: [BUG] inconsistency in $localstatedir and $runstatedir Alejandro Colomar
  • Re: [BUG] inconsistency in $localstatedir and $runstatedir Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: [BUG] inconsistency in $localstatedir and $runstatedir Alejandro Colomar
  • Re: [BUG] inconsistency in $localstatedir and $runstatedir Alfred M. Szmidt
• egrep as usual utility Bruno Haible
  • Re: egrep as usual utility Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: egrep as usual utility Paul Eggert
• Small typo in the GNU Standards manual Maxim Cournoyer
• tarballs -> tar files Karl Berry
• [gnu.org #1784615] Textual change regarding ftp-upload instructions Therese Godefroy via RT
  • Re: [gnu.org #1784615] Textual change regarding ftp-upload instructions Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: [gnu.org #1784615] Textual change regarding ftp-upload instructions Ian Kelling
  • Re: [gnu.org #1784615] Textual change regarding ftp-upload instructions Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: [gnu.org #1784615] Textual change regarding ftp-upload instructions Ian Kelling
• [gnu.org #1783839] Updating info about fencepost account availability Jason Self via RT
  • Re: [gnu.org #1783839] Updating info about fencepost account availability John Darrington
  • [gnu.org #1783839] Updating info about fencepost account availability Jason Self via RT
  • Re: [gnu.org #1783839] Updating info about fencepost account availability Alfred M. Szmidt
  • Re: [gnu.org #1783839] Updating info about fencepost account availability Alfred M. Szmidt
• Re: bug-standards Digest, Vol 119, Issue 4 Simon Sobisch

• Earlier messages