Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, the text in question is taken directly from the "License > Notices" section of maintain.texi > <http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/gnulib/doc/maintain.texi?content-type=text%2Fplain&rev=1.19&root=gnulib>). > I just now checked, and it's byte-for-byte identical.
Yes, but in my opinion it is not meant for a verbatim inclusion, since right before it, maintain.texi says: Here is an example of the license notice to use after the copyright notice. Please adjust the list of invariant sections as appropriate for your manual. (If there are none, then say "with no invariant sections".) In our case: > > the document does not contain it anyway. > > The document contains the section by inclusion (see the "@include > fdl.texi"). No, it does not. The title of the included section is 'GNU Free Documentation License', whereas the copyright part refers to 'Invariant Sections being "GNU General Public License"'. So, either we remove the invariant section notice, or change it to 'Invariant Sections being "GNU Free Documentation License"'. Regards, Sergey _______________________________________________ Bug-tar mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-tar
