On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 04:04:36PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:09:56 -0800 > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:34:21PM -0500, Karl Berry wrote: > > > > > > Hmm, I think it would be actually be good to fix the cpp manual to omit > > > the leading # so the alphabetization could have a better effect. As the > > > Autoconf and Texinfo and probably other manuals do. > > > > I tried that; it looks even sillier. The index of directives is very > > short: > > Then perhaps you should consider adding more index entries ;-)
I'd have to add more directives to do that... > Also, if the number of directives is very small, why make them a > separate index? As the author I feel it's useful to have an index that lists all the directives and nothing but the directives. It is not obvious from the table of contents which directives are described where. I realize this is a specialized situation, but trust me, this is the most logical way to do this particular index. zw _______________________________________________ Bug-texinfo mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo
