> From: Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 31 Mar 2002 16:05:55 +0300
>
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@
> already_outputting_pending_notes++;
> execute_string ("%s", footnote->note);
> already_outputting_pending_notes--;
> - add_word ("</p>\n");
> + add_word ("</p>\n</li>\n");
> }
Please be very careful about this change. The markup generated for
footnotes strikes a fine balance between the need to produce something
that looks like a footnore (a notion that HTML lacks) and the
capabilities of popular browsers. IIRC, it took a few iterations to
arrive at the current version of the code, and it's quite possible
that it doesn't produce a </li> on purpose. Do we _really_ need to
add the </li> (yes, I know about Lint-like utilities that could
complain; but do we actually _need_ to comply)?
_______________________________________________
Bug-texinfo mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-texinfo
