On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, you wrote: > I think automake is objecting to that, expecting only one copy of > the .dvi file to exist after texi2dvi runs. > > I made the change below, let me know. > > Unfortunately there are still cases where original.dvi can be left, > namely on subsequent runs (ie, when the cmp succeeds). I am finding it > hard to disentangle the logic of all this. > > But I think doing mv instead of cp will at least help the automake test > scenario?
Yes. With the amended texi2dvi, all automake tests attempted on my platform now succeed. You might make a note to run an automake test run yourself before releasing the next texinfo version. ---- Michael Deutschmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
