On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:16:48PM -0500, Karl Berry wrote:
> -\def\codex #1{\tclose{#1}\endgroup}
> +\def\codex #1{\tclose{\scantokens{#1}}\endgroup}
>
> I am scared of this change.
Yeah, I was concerned about it as well...
> Maybe we could make ` and ' active all the time, like " and other
> characters are now.
You mean this:
@@ -9010,6 +9010,11 @@
@[EMAIL PROTECTED] = @other
@[EMAIL PROTECTED] = @other
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally, make ` and ' active, so that txicodequoteundirected
and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] txicodequotebacktick work right in, say, @[EMAIL PROTECTED] b
c'}}: if we
[EMAIL PROTECTED] don't make ` and ' active, @code will not get them as active
chars.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@'[EMAIL PROTECTED] @let'@rq
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] @c ` is already defined above.
@c Local variables:
@c eval: (add-hook 'write-file-hooks 'time-stamp)
I've tested it a bit, seems to work even inside indices. Can you
think of situations where this change might cause trouble? I couldn't
find anything suspicious in texinfo.tex.
Best,
Oleg
