> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:45:21 -0800 (PST) > From: Michael Witten <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], Jari Aalto <[email protected]> > > However, there are essentially 2 related reasons why people contribute > to any project: > > (1) To improve the project. > (2) To receive recognition and glory. > > and in my experience, (1) is not nearly so sweet without (2). > > It's simply not fair when a contributor's work is *officially* filed > under someone else's name
??? How does CVS cause that, exactly? And what do you mean by ``filed under someone else's name'', anyway? Isn't the contributor's name spelled out in the ChangeLog entry for the change? > CVS isn't just outdated technically; it's outdated morally. I don't know what are you talking about here. Really. Feel free to explain this attack.
