On 16 June 2015 at 01:26, Gavin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15 June 2015 at 18:37, Gavin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> Another idea which I had while writing this email, which I haven't >> explored yet, is for the parser to be able to return in the tree it >> creates elements that are "free variables", which could be substituted >> in afterwards. This could be done for undefined @value's; or maybe >> another command could be invented for this purpose. Actually, looking >> at the code in Parser.pm I think undefined @value's stay in the tree >> already, so this could work well. > > I've made some progress on this idea and it is quite promising. There > are still some test failures to investigate, though (13/11161).
Committed at long last.
