On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 12:30:35PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 12:13:12PM +0000, jai-bholeki wrote: > > > > > I'm not sure how sensible it is to use @section without a @node or vice > > > versa. A @node without a section wouldn't be in the section toc anyway, > > > if I understand correctly. > > > > @node makes a separate page. If your sections are small, by simply > > removing @node, you can get the sections together. > > That's one thing people may use this for, and I've seen this in real > documents (much more so than bare @nodes). The @heading commands are also > there and it's probably the correct way to use those instead. But this > would be an argument against changing USE_NODES to 0, as I understand that > this would put each of the sections into a separate file anyway.
Ok, so let's forget about setting USE_NODES to 0 in the default case. Maybe the fact that the sectiontoc may lead to node being unreachable if they do not have associated section could be put in the manual? -- Pat
