On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 11:39:21AM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:18:58PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > What about replacing INLINE_CONTENTS by a customization variable for all > > the contents locations possibilities, for example > > OUTPUT_CONTENTS_LOCATION > > which could take value > > inline or at_commands (INLINE_CONTENTS=1) > > separate_or_end (current INLINE_CONTENTS=0 case, separate if split, at > > end otherwise) > > after_top (the new option you propose which would become the default) > > before_top (after title) > > and there could be too > > separate > > end > > I see you implemented this. I suggest a few changes: > > OUTPUT_CONTENTS_LOCATION to be changed to CONTENTS_OUTPUT_LOCATION > or just CONTENTS_LOCATION (both noun phrases). OUTPUT_CONTENTS is > another possibility (an imperative clause like FORMAT_MENU), or > CONTENTS_OUTPUT (viewing "output" as a noun rather than a verb). > > Use "inline" instead of "at_commands" (not clear whether the latter means > output the menu "at" where the commands were given, or if it means commands > starting with the at sign @ (i.e. all Texinfo commands)). > > I should be able to easily make these changes myself, which I will do > unless there are further suggestions.
Le me do the changes, I have another commit in progress. -- Pat
