On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:28:46PM -0800, Per Bothner wrote: > On 2/15/21 5:41 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I had a look at the result when there is no node, with a document like > > Note the patch in your reply, which probably was a reply to this: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2021-02/msg00042.html > > *did* test $command->{'extra'}->{'associated_node'}.
Indeed, but not for the objective I want to use that key. In your patch it was used to find the node, in my proposal, it is to find whether or not there is a node associated and then define section differently. I have not tested with the original patch, but I am pretty sure that the issue I reported arised with it too. > However, that doesn't seem to have have made it into the checked-in version. Indeed, Gavin removed that part to keep a span for nodes. -- Pat
