On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 08:08:06PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> I had issues with the spacing around the commas, as there was too much
> space before the commas. (In fact, the examples at that stackexchange
> didn't look quite right, either.) I got a better result by setting
> \scriptsize to 0pt for the footnote marker, which eliminates 0.5 pt
> of horizontal space after the superscripted text, and hence before an
> immediately following footnote. I also added 1 mu (math mode unit as
> we are in a math superscript) of space after the comma, so that it would
> be closer to the preceding number than the succeeding number. Basically
> trial and error to get something that looked good to me. (If nobody notices
> or thinks about the spacing of the output, then we'll have done a good
> job.)
>
> commit ea7f0150ced73bacc395c7bcac84e908b959f67a
> Author: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0...@gmail.com>
> Date: 2025-07-31 20:05:39 +0100
Ach, I've just realised the comma shows up in the footnote itself. Watch
this space.
