On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 08:20:39PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 08:08:06PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote: > > I had issues with the spacing around the commas, as there was too much > > space before the commas. (In fact, the examples at that stackexchange > > didn't look quite right, either.) I got a better result by setting > > \scriptsize to 0pt for the footnote marker, which eliminates 0.5 pt > > of horizontal space after the superscripted text, and hence before an > > immediately following footnote. I also added 1 mu (math mode unit as > > we are in a math superscript) of space after the comma, so that it would > > be closer to the preceding number than the succeeding number. Basically > > trial and error to get something that looked good to me. (If nobody notices > > or thinks about the spacing of the output, then we'll have done a good > > job.) > > > > commit ea7f0150ced73bacc395c7bcac84e908b959f67a > > Author: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0...@gmail.com> > > Date: 2025-07-31 20:05:39 +0100 > > Ach, I've just realised the comma shows up in the footnote itself. Watch > this space.
Fixed in commit 796106628496.
