I just realized I forgot to copy the below message to the
bug reporting email address.  Thanks for your help.

Jan

------- Forwarded Message

Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from CS.Stanford.EDU (CS.Stanford.EDU [171.64.64.64])
        by DB.Stanford.EDU (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA01230
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:13:45 -0700
Received: from Sole.Stanford.EDU (Sole.Stanford.EDU [171.64.75.100])
        by CS.Stanford.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA12722
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (jan@localhost) by Sole.Stanford.EDU (8.8.8+Sun/8.7.2) with 
ESMTP id MAA26444; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Jan Jannink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jan Jannink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: sort bug? 
In-reply-to: Your e-mail of "10 Apr 2001 20:52:34 +0200."
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:13:44 -0700
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thanks for the quick reply.  Two points:

1. can you add a -p flag to force POSIX order (easier in many cases
        than unsetting and resetting environment variables)
   alternatively add an -e flag (followed by the environment setting)
        this gives you a place to write about environment in the docs

2. textutils 2.0 still produces a more logical order than textutils 2.0.11

(from 2.0) -- note position of:  b1-d_2

b_1-a
b_1-a
b1-a
b_1-d
b1-d_2
b1-d2
b1-d2
b1-s
b_1-w
b_1-z
b1-z

(from 2.0.11)

b_1-a
b_1-a
b1-a
b_1-d
b1-d2
b1-d2
b1-d_2
b1-s
b_1-w
b_1-z
b1-z


Thanks again,   Jan

------- End of Forwarded Message


_______________________________________________
Bug-textutils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-textutils

Reply via email to