Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> > waiting interval specified by this function is influenced by
> > -...@code{--random-wait}, which see.
> > +...@code{--random-wait}.
>
> "Which see" is no typo, it suggests to the user to also look at the
> documentation of "--random-wait" command-line option.
It may not have been a typo, but it doesn't parse in English. The best
alternative that comes to me is to add the following new sentence after
Jeff's proposed edit: Refer to @code{--random-wait} for more information.
Tony