I believe hh's suggestion is to have the format reflect the way it would look 
in a URL; so [ and ] around ipv6, and nothing around ipv4 (since ipv4 format 
isn't ambiguous in the way ipv6 is).

(Sent by my Kindle Fire)
-mjc

Sent from my Kindle Fire

_____________________________________________
From: Sasikanth <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri Jan 06 01:56:34 PST 2012
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Bug-wget] [PATCH] [wget-bug #32357],      IPv6 addresses not 
formatted..


Currently we are not checking family type of the address before printing
the message.

Do we have to print the message as [3ffe:b80:17e2::1]:80 for ipv6 and
|10.0.0.1|:80 for ipv4?

Please confirm so I will resubmit patch.

Thanks
Sasi


Note: I didn't get the reply to my mail, to keep track the discussion I
had copied the mail content from the mailing list.

Shouldn't IPv6 addresses be displayed like this instead:
[3ffe:b80:17e2::1]:80

/hh
Den 5 jan 2012 14:15 skrev "Sasikanth" <address@hidden>:

> Hi,
>
> This very small change related to display issue.
> The bug id is 32357
"https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?32357";;
>
> When we run wget with an ip address alone (wget 10.0.0.1 or wget
> http://10.0.0.1/ or wget http://[3ffe:b80:17e2::1])
> the display shows as
>
> IPV4
> Connecting to 10.0.0.1:80...
> IPV6
> Connecting to 3ffe:b80:17e2::1:80 (Because of IPV6 format (ff::01)
it is
> little hard differentiate the ipv6 address and port number)
>
> This patch will show the display
>
> IPV4
> Connecting to |10.0.0.1|:80...
> IPV6
> Connecting to |3ffe:b80:17e2::1|:80
>
>
> Thanks
> Sasi

Reply via email to