Micah Cowan <mi...@micah.cowan.name> writes: > I believe hh's suggestion is to have the format reflect the way it would look > in a URL; so [ and ] around ipv6, and nothing around ipv4 (since ipv4 format > isn't ambiguous in the way ipv6 is).
I agree. Please rework your patch to use [address]:port just for IPv6. This message should be fixed as well "Reusing existing connection to ADDRESS:IP.". Please also provide a ChangeLog file entry. Thanks for your contribution! Giuseppe
