On Saturday 26 May 2012 08:09:27 Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> writes: > > that doesn't make sense here. the zlib API has always defined gzFile, > > and has operated on that. it has never utilized gzFile*. the fact that > > it didn't warn in the past was due to the zlib API not containing code > > that'd implicitly check it, and the reason it doesn't fail at runtime is > > that gzFile internally is basically a pointer. so a pointer to a struct > > is the same size as a pointer to a pointer, thus the ABI/generated code > > is unchanged. > > I have added the changelog entry and pushed it.
when you said ChangeLog entry, i thought you were referring to the commit message. i guess you meant literally the ChangeLog file ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
