On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]> wrote: > Darshit Shah <[email protected]> writes: > >> Has anyone tested out this patch yet? >> >> I'd really like some feedback on this before it gets merged. I prefer >> this implementation of the progress bar over the original one. Does >> anybody have any issues / suggestions? > > it looks very nice, thanks to have worked on it. > > Do you think we could make an argument to --progress instead? Something > like: > > wget --progress=bar:force:noscroll ...
Given the number of people who asked for a noscroll option, I think this one would be often used and hence, I'd like to keep as short an option for this as possible. In fact I was thinking about adding a short option, -ns or something similar. > > Giuseppe -- Thanking You, Darshit Shah
