On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]> wrote: > Darshit Shah <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Darshit Shah <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> Has anyone tested out this patch yet? >>>> >>>> I'd really like some feedback on this before it gets merged. I prefer >>>> this implementation of the progress bar over the original one. Does >>>> anybody have any issues / suggestions? >>> >>> it looks very nice, thanks to have worked on it. >>> >>> Do you think we could make an argument to --progress instead? Something >>> like: >>> >>> wget --progress=bar:force:noscroll ... >> >> Given the number of people who asked for a noscroll option, I think >> this one would be often used and hence, I'd like to keep as short an >> option for this as possible. In fact I was thinking about adding a >> short option, -ns or something similar. > > well, if we implement it trough --progress these people can just type it > once in their ~/.wgetrc file. > > I am just hesitant to add a new command line argument as we will get stuck > with it forever if we'll change idea. > Right, I didn't think about using it through wgetrc. I'll add it as a parameter there then. > Giuseppe
-- Thanking You, Darshit Shah
