Matthew Atkinson <[email protected]> writes: > On 20/10/14 21:16, Tim Rühsen wrote: > >> Since Wget does not explicitly support PUT, we may just care for the POST >> request. Since servers may reject a POST without Content-Length, we are >> better >> off with supplying one. Since PUT (and also PATCH) request 'anticipate' a >> body, >> we could also care for these. >> >> Matthew, could you also check for 'put and 'patch' request and send an >> amended >> version of the patch. FYI, HTTP PATCH request is rfc5789. > > Attached
thanks pushed now! Congratulations on your first contribution to wget. Regards, Giuseppe
