Am Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2014, 09:39:25 schrieb Matthew Atkinson: > On 20/10/14 21:16, Tim Rühsen wrote: > > Since Wget does not explicitly support PUT, we may just care for the POST > > request. Since servers may reject a POST without Content-Length, we are > > better off with supplying one. Since PUT (and also PATCH) request > > 'anticipate' a body, we could also care for these. > > > > Matthew, could you also check for 'put and 'patch' request and send an > > amended version of the patch. FYI, HTTP PATCH request is rfc5789. > > Attached
Good work, thanks ! Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
