Aah! Thanks a bunch for pulling the details. I'll look into this (mostly) over the next weekend. Shouldn't be too hard.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Tim Ruehsen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 20 January 2015 14:45:50 Darshit Shah wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Tim Ruehsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Sunday 18 January 2015 15:57:47 Darshit Shah wrote: >> >> This patch causes --show-progress to display the progress bar to the >> >> screen even when the --logfile option is provided to Wget. >> >> >> >> If the --show-progress option is not explicitly enabled, then the old >> >> behavior of printing the DOT progress to the log file is followed. >> >> Do review the patch, and if no one has objections I'll push this in a few >> >> days >> > >> > Hi Darshit, >> > >> > --show-progress in combination with -o looks very good ! >> >> Thanks! I'll push it in a few hours once I'm back on my machine. >> >> > A while ago I made a suggestion for displaying long file names (remember >> > ?). Are you going to implement that, too ? >> >> I forget, what was it again? Been a little too busy with my work and >> hence have completely pushed these things aside. > > The thread was "Reverse Scrolling Direction", my answer dated 4.12. 09:41:20. > > It was (shortened) > - if the path is too long, just print the filename. > - if the filename is too long use ... in between > > Guiseppe's answer was > "that is a cool idea. > > Saving to: 'www.hostname.d.de/lkdfsldkflsdf/subdir/xxx/file-to-save' > > www.hostname.d.de/lkdfsldkfls[...]xx/file-to-save [ <=> > ] 77.81K --.-KB/s in > 0.1s > > I guess something like that, by default, would make happy everyone:-)" > > Tim -- Thanking You, Darshit Shah
