So, I tried pushing the changes, but I'm unable to do so. git push gives me the following error:
Counting objects: 11, done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (11/11), done. Writing objects: 100% (11/11), 1.62 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 11 (delta 10), reused 0 (delta 0) error: unpack failed: unpack-objects abnormal exit To git://git.savannah.gnu.org/wget.git ! [remote rejected] master -> master (n/a (unpacker error)) error: failed to push some refs to 'git://git.savannah.gnu.org/wget.git' I even tried a fresh clone of Wget, but I keep getting the same error which leads me to believe that the issue is in the savannah servers. I've opened a support ticket, but if someone is able to push to the repository, please push this commit. On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Darshit Shah <[email protected]> wrote: > Aah! Thanks a bunch for pulling the details. > > I'll look into this (mostly) over the next weekend. Shouldn't be too hard. > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Tim Ruehsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tuesday 20 January 2015 14:45:50 Darshit Shah wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Tim Ruehsen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > On Sunday 18 January 2015 15:57:47 Darshit Shah wrote: >>> >> This patch causes --show-progress to display the progress bar to the >>> >> screen even when the --logfile option is provided to Wget. >>> >> >>> >> If the --show-progress option is not explicitly enabled, then the old >>> >> behavior of printing the DOT progress to the log file is followed. >>> >> Do review the patch, and if no one has objections I'll push this in a few >>> >> days >>> > >>> > Hi Darshit, >>> > >>> > --show-progress in combination with -o looks very good ! >>> >>> Thanks! I'll push it in a few hours once I'm back on my machine. >>> >>> > A while ago I made a suggestion for displaying long file names (remember >>> > ?). Are you going to implement that, too ? >>> >>> I forget, what was it again? Been a little too busy with my work and >>> hence have completely pushed these things aside. >> >> The thread was "Reverse Scrolling Direction", my answer dated 4.12. 09:41:20. >> >> It was (shortened) >> - if the path is too long, just print the filename. >> - if the filename is too long use ... in between >> >> Guiseppe's answer was >> "that is a cool idea. >> >> Saving to: 'www.hostname.d.de/lkdfsldkflsdf/subdir/xxx/file-to-save' >> >> www.hostname.d.de/lkdfsldkfls[...]xx/file-to-save [ <=> >> ] 77.81K --.-KB/s >> in 0.1s >> >> I guess something like that, by default, would make happy everyone:-)" >> >> Tim > > > > -- > Thanking You, > Darshit Shah -- Thanking You, Darshit Shah
