W dniu 06.04.2015 o 21:25, Ángel González pisze:
> I agree it is helpful to name them differently. What about this
> alternative rename?
It has the advantage of unconditional `xfree`, but the call to
`idna_to_ascii_8z` is more complicated. It is hard to tell which one is
better.

> (I'm the host reassignation by using a ternary, plus touched a comment)
We should probably also fix this comment:
>        /* sXXXav : free new when needed ! */
As it presumably mentions the problem that we are going to repair.


Regards,
Hubert

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to