On Donnerstag, 23. März 2017 11:21:37 CEST Darshit Shah wrote: > There are two points here, we should keep the mandatory dependencies at > a bare minimum. That is one of the features that made Wget 1.x more > popular with the embedded crowd. If someone does not care about > non-ascii domain names, it should be possible to build Wget2 without > IDNA. > > However, when building with IDNA, we may make IDNA 2008 (libidn2) the > minimum requirement. For this, the important thing to look at is which > platforms / systems will suffer. Far as I am aware, most distros and > platforms have libidn2 available as a package, but if there are systems > where this is not the case, we should evaluate whether we would like to > drop full compatibility for such systems. > > Anyways, this boils down to: > > 1. IDNA is not a hard build dependency. Hence, we should detect for its > absence and ignore running tests that depend on it.
Just made a commit to address this issue. Regards, Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
