Hi Vijo.Thanks for the report. It turns out that the repositories were set to private. GitLab provides finer grained access control than I'd anticipated. I have set everything (I could find) to public now.
If there are any more issues, please feel free to contact us here again.
* Vijo Cherian <[email protected]> [170423 07:19]:
Thanks Darshit. Gitlab.com/gnuwget seems to be empty. There doesn't seem to be any issues or a repo. Am I looking at the wrong URL? Best, Vijo. On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Darshit Shah <[email protected]> wrote:Hi, As many of you are aware, we've been working on Wget2 (aka Wget 2.x) for some time now. We have also been using GitHub in general for collaborating our efforts on Wget2. However, today I'd like to announce that we will instead be moving all our efforts on Wget2 to a new home on GitLab. GitLab is not only more "free" than GitHub is, but also provides us with a few more features. In particular it gives us access to highly customizable CI options. This allows us to have more control over the environment in which out CI runs as compared to Travis. Tim has just finished setting up the GNU Wget group[1] on GitLab. We will organize all development for Wget2 under this group. This means that we expect all new bug reports and pull requests to be made on GitLab from now on. We understand that this may be annoying for many users, but the convenience of having more control over such an important aspect of the development process will win over in the long term. We've also finished migrating all the existing issues and PRs from GitHub to our GitLab repositories Hope to see everyone on GitLab soon! [1]: https://gitlab.com/gnuwget -- Thanking You, Darshit Shah PGP Fingerprint: 7845 120B 07CB D8D6 ECE5 FF2B 2A17 43ED A91A 35B6
-- Thanking You, Darshit Shah PGP Fingerprint: 7845 120B 07CB D8D6 ECE5 FF2B 2A17 43ED A91A 35B6
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
