On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 11:39:14PM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote: > Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > >>:You have to explicitly set GENCAT=gencat for such a configuration. I > >>:know it is a (minor) hassle, but we can't simply drop it, because of the > >>:implications for iterative builds. I also don't want to add the old, > >>:non-getopt compatible argument handling to the new gencat. > >You mean other than having to revert to hackish argument parsing? Heck, > >the cleanest way would be to change the default value in the 1.2 tree > >based on OS version or make version. > > I seem to fail to see the problem: don't we build gencat as host tool? > Or what's the issue?
It is. But it is also used (unnecessarily) build NLS catalogs for the bootstrap tools and that's where it is bailing out. Joerg
