On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 06:05:25PM +0100, Hiten Pandya wrote: > Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > > As an alternative we could implement a NO_NLS feature to the build. > > But I still think it's easier to simply support (as in accept and > > ignore) '-new'. > > I think everyone is just overcomplicating the issue. It is better to just > add the -new option to the old gencat utility. Adding such options for > supporting backward compatibility is not a bad thing at all and I don't > see why the code would look ugly.
It is the other way around, the new gencat doesn't support the option. Using NO_NLS makes sense anyway, since it makes the world more self-contained. Joerg
