DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20334>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20334 Valid Encoded URL rejected with a 404 error [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Summary|Valid Encoded URL rejected |Valid Encoded URL rejected |with a 404 error |with a 404 error ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-05-29 18:02 ------- Please see the AllowEncodedSlashes directive, introduced in 2.0.46. But a word anyway: foo%2Findex.html is not identical to foo/index.html, since the slash character is "reserved" and has a special semantic meaning (http url path seperator). If you encode it as %2f, it won't be treated as path separator therefore. So please do not expect a wrong behaviour. Thanks for using Apache. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
