DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15869>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15869 cache ignores max-age cache-directive ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-07 21:09 ------- AFAIK, CVS has only one HEAD :-) If my interpretation of Apache devel instructions is correct, CVS HEAD corresponds to 2.1.0-dev version of apache. The Server header emited by Apache seems to suggest that as well. I am sure the segfault cause will be removed before we have time to produce the corresponding bug report. This has happened before. We will do our best, but please note that we have to concentrate on compliance problems. We will try to test the same change against APACHE_2_0_BRANCH. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
