DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15852>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15852 cache MUST attach Warning 113 to hits older than 24 hours ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-22 17:52 ------- Sorry, I do all my testing using 2.1-dev. That might explain some of the difference. Other differences might relate to the cache method used. I'm betting you are using mod_disk_cache? I usually use mod_mem_cache. I'm working on tracking down the differences between 2.0 and 2.1-dev and between mod_disk_cache and mod_mem_cache. They should both work the same, but I know that mod_disk_cache has more problems than mod_mem_cache. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
