DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30260>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30260

apr_socket_connect(() fails under load: Only one usage of each socket address 
(protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-07-22 16:26 -------
(Adding comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Graham Leggett wrote:


>> Can you look at the comments at
>> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30260 - 
>> apparently this may be a Windows specific problem.
>>


Could be, or not.

If for example after connect I write:

if (rv == 730048) { 
  apr_socket_close(*newsock);
  *newsock = NULL;
  continue;
}


It goes in an infinite loop, but it should not.
 
 

>> I'm a unix type, so the windows issues are not something I am 
>> familiar with.
>>


Think that has nothing to do with windows (I even lowered the thread count
to 50), but not sure.
If someone wishes to check that on some worker mpm with high thread count.

It serves 1995 conections, either ab -n 2000 or 2 x ab -n 1000 (the first
one has no errors, the second has 5 errors).
After that any attempt to connect to mod_proxy returns 503.

I've spend couple of hours trying to find the bug, or at least the reason,
but I'm slightly loosing the interest.

Regards,
MT.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to