DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35122>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35122 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-05 05:11 ------- According to the svn log this code was added by Jeff Trawick 4 years ago, so he would be the only one to know for sure. After looking at more of the code my best guess is that scope ids are not allowed in the Host: header because they are not allowed in the vhost configuration (in get_addresses(): if (scope_id) { return "Scope ids are not supported"; }). And they are probably not allowed in the vhost configuration because the semantics are not obvious and/or nobody wanted to implement them. However, that's IMHO no good reason to reject a scope id in the Host: header with a 400 Bad Request message indicating a client error (if anything it's a server error, so 501 Not Implemented would be more appropriate). Simply ignoring the scope id should be acceptable as an easy fix, although not completely correct. The correct solution (I think) would be to allow scoped addresses in the vhost configuration and store the scope together with the IP address. Then get the scope from the sockets of incoming requests and compare that to the stored scope, as if it was part of the IP address (which it is, kind of). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
