DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35404>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35404 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-18 17:17 ------- I'll have to check, but I should be able to provide our module if you could take a look at it. As for your other question I have no idea where it is leaking, any suggestions on things to look for I'd appreciate. The module does no memory allocation of its own , just 3 apr_palloc calls. It does create a socket to the other program,and opens up the newly cached file to send to the client. But even if those were not being closed somehow apache seems to be growing much faster than that amount of memory. The only clue I have found so far is that on the machines where this module is called I see this error message in the error logs for a very small number of requests, and never see it on boxes that don't have to call the module. [Fri Jun 17 12:36:50 2005] [info] (9)Bad File Descriptor: core_output_filter: These msgs are at a smaller frequency then the (32) Broken PIpe which are due to the client just disconnecting. I'd appreciate any suggestions you can make. Thanks, David. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
