DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39243>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39243 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-14 07:33 ------- > But you should really design your site to ensure that the first > request to a client-cert-protected area is not a POST request with a > large body; make it a GET or something. Not really an option with SOAP. > I have to believe the "one size limit fits all" approach will not > work for all the existing applications in the world. Agreed. > However, shouldn't we add a SSLMaxIOBuffer directive instead of > hardcoding the value at build time? That is a good way to remove the hard-coded limit. But is there a reason why one could not use the existing directive LimitRequestBody, as suggested above? It can be set for the client cert protected area and then defines the size of requests that should be handled, thus the amount that should be allowed to be buffered. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
