DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42321>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42321 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-02 12:25 ------- After recomping mod_bluestem, per note 2, the problem still exists. Why do you set off_t to long when off_t and long are the same. It is a no-op and a waste of code for configure. If it is supposed to be that way, then there still is a MAJOR bug in apache. r->per_dir_config should NEVER be NULL when calling modules. The macro, ap_get_module_config never test to see of r->per_dir_config is NULL. The second point, per the comments in configure.in # Special case: off_t may change size with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS # on 32-bit systems with LFS support. To avoid compatibility # with other software which may export _FILE_OFFSET_BITS, # hard-code apr_off_t to long. This means that _FILE_OFFSET_BITS is set to something other than a long. On a 32 bit OS, that is 4 bytes. The test case will be true if off_t == long. The comments do not say this, the comments imply that off_t != long. That makes the test wrong. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
