DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42665>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42665 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-21 02:31 ------- > if r->finfo.filetype is neither APR_DIR nor APR_REG, then what? Whoops. The patch corrects an optimization. In other words, the code is supposed to work correctly even without the optimization--the entire optimization could be removed and the code should still function correctly. The patch corrects the optimization so that it handles and cases r->finfo.filetype == APR_DIR and r->finfo.filetype == APR_REG. If r->finfo.filetype is neither APR_DIR nor APR_REG, then the optimization simply falls through and executes the code below, which again is intended to correctly handle all cases. So the answer to your question is: it does whatever it would do if the optimization did not exists. > also I believe your change to validating the symlink status is not a valid > change. Please explain since that has little to do with the proposed problem > and solution. I don't understand what those two sentences say. Please elaborate. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
