DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43958>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43958 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-26 13:23 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Dear Ruediger, > > Thanks for the input > I've tested with acquire=100; This does not help. > > From the docs: > "acquire - If set this will be the maximum time to wait for a free > connection in the connection pool. If there are no free connections in the > pool > the Apache will return SERVER_BUSY status to the client." > > The problem at hand is *not* that there is no free worker available (in that No the problem is that there are no *free* connections available for some worker and this is what acquire should prevent. In the unbalanced case this causes a HTTP_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE to be returned to the client if no free connection can be obtained from the worker in acquire ms time and in the balanced case it should cause a fail over to the next worker after this time. If it does not (and according to you it does not) this is a bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
