https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45478
--- Comment #5 from Will Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-24 15:48:44 PST ---
Yes, though it's irrelevant as there is no other way to specify a custom
response code and therefore this feature should not have been broken.
I'm 99% certain it did work in 2.0, and perhaps as far back as 1.3. I've
used it in custom rules to cripple Host:'less requests (anonymous crawlers).
In the <300, >=400 cases, one can think of this as [R{esponse}=nnn} as
opposed to [R{edirect}], and it really harms nothing to overload it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
