https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35217
--- Comment #9 from rahul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-26 10:46:18 PST --- | In addition, none of the above HTTP headers contains the "max-age" | Cache-Control directive, IMO. Your original bug was that the entry that you posted (Cache-control: "xxxx"=blah) was a valid extension directive. But as per the RFC, it is not. The question now, is as to what the httpd should do when faced with an invalid entry. That question is open to further deliberation. IMO that is fair game for httpd to do as it pleases. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
