https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38642
--- Comment #12 from Aleksander Budzynowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-23 14:01:51 PST --- >> I am leaning towards whacking r->path_info as soon as we know we've >> effectively made it useless by replacing r->filename in per-directory >> context, rather then thinking harder about when we should spill r->path_info >> into ctx->uri by saving info away in some previous step. That's exactly what I thought at first. But then I found this: http://213.11.80.10/manual/cgi_path.html And I quote: "Apache 1.2 and later now determine SCRIPT_NAME and PATH_INFO by looking directly at the URL" So maybe it's not such a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
