https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38642
--- Comment #13 from Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-23 14:12:55 PST --- (In reply to comment #12) > >> I am leaning towards whacking r->path_info as soon as we know we've > >> effectively made it useless by replacing r->filename in per-directory > >> context, rather then thinking harder about when we should spill > >> r->path_info into ctx->uri by saving info away in some previous step. > > That's exactly what I thought at first. But then I found this: > http://213.11.80.10/manual/cgi_path.html > > And I quote: "Apache 1.2 and later now determine SCRIPT_NAME and PATH_INFO by > looking directly at the URL" > > So maybe it's not such a good idea. > I thought that since this is per-directory, PT-like behavior is implied so whenever we change the filename and re-inject into apache, so PATH_INFO is very soon to be "fixed" by the core. The only time it lasts longer is when we have another rule or two to look at before re-injecting. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
