https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48388
--- Comment #15 from Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #14) > (In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #13) > > (In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #10) > > > Created attachment 32341 [details] > > > Don't put normal (non balancer-member) workers in error (trunk/2.4.x) > > > > > > This patch should prevent httpd from putting workers which are *not* > > > load-balancer members in error state, since we don't want the retry > > > timeout > > > to be applied when there is no alternative to connect to. > > > > -1 as this being hardcoded. This can be already done with retry=0. We may > > discuss to set retry=0 as a default value in this case if not set > > explicitly. It may make sense to put even a single backend in error state > > for some time to give the backend some time to recover without new requests > > sent to it and have them blocked at the reverse proxy layer. > > Nothing is hardcoded here, the default being still status=-I for > balancer-members, but changed to status=+I for the standalone workers (but > it can still be opt-out). Sorry I misread the patch here. So no worries. As said changing the default makes sense for trunk. As this setup can already be reached by explicit configuration I would not backport it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
