https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58593
--- Comment #10 from Tabby <[email protected]> --- Sorry, but I'm a bit confused. Since using the same URL for ws(s) and http(s) seems to be perfectly legal (although I'd always go with distinct URL patterns), I'm not sure about what you are suggesting to do. At the moment, is there a valid alternative to this? --- RewriteRule ^/ws/live/(.*) %{ENV:proto}://vip-be/wwgw/var/$1 [P,QSA,L] <Proxy http://vip-be/wwgw/var> ProxySet smax=0 ttl=15 </Proxy> --- Furthermore: is it necessary, in your opinion, to add a <Proxy> block also for ws, in order to keep its connection alive or is it worthless because of its long-living nature? Thanks ST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
