https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703

Stefan Eissing <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #1 from Stefan Eissing <[email protected]> ---
You are correct that the implementation and its backend connection use changed.
The former implementation tried exactly what you describe as "natural", but it
proved to be too brittle.

After several attempts to fix it, I scrapped the idea and made a solid
implementation which is less ambitious. Based on the feedback I got, people use
it now in production without issues.

I would love to attempt a new implementation of the original idea, but am
lacking the time for that myself. It is not a trivial task as the whole proxy
infrastructure is not build for such parallel use.

The module is marked as "experimental" because we feared that the
implementation was not stable enough to survive without radical changes. So,
though you are correct that this change is a regression, it is not one we plan
to fix.

While we would like all our experiments to be successful and the road for them
to be straight, sometimes we need to make turns or even rebuild them.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to